The Panel Is on a Different Basis
- Values here are stated per 100g or 100ml
- Percentages run against a 2,000 calorie reference
- A per-serving-only panel does not satisfy it

Most brands arrive expecting a translation job. The nutrition panel has to be rebuilt on a different basis, the Arabic has to be constructed to a standard rather than rendered, and claims that were legal at home may not be allowed here. Only one of those three is translation.
We read your label against the UAE requirements and report what has to change before it goes anywhere near a submission. The deliverable is a marked-up assessment, not finished artwork.
Two standards do most of the work. General labelling of pre-packaged food sits under GSO 9, and nutritional labelling under GSO 2233. Both are Gulf standards adopted nationally as UAE versions.
Your designer or printer makes the changes. We tell them precisely what those changes are, which is usually faster and cheaper than discovering them at a label assessment.
A defined set of nutrients, on a defined basis. Values are expressed per 100g or per 100ml, and a per-serving column may be shown alongside rather than instead.
Declared in both kilocalories and kilojoules. Labels carrying only one of the two are a routine correction.
Both declared, with saturated fat shown separately rather than folded into the total figure.
Total carbohydrate, with sugars declared separately. How carbohydrate is calculated can differ from your home market.
Declared in the panel. Where your existing label omits it, a laboratory figure is usually the shortest route.
Declared as sodium. Labels expressing salt instead need converting, which is arithmetic rather than testing.
Where present in significant amounts, and expressed against reference intake values rather than as raw figures.
Only those the standards permit, and the two kinds are treated differently. A nutrition claim says something about content, such as a product being a source of fibre. A health claim connects a nutrient to a health effect, and it is held to a higher bar.
Both sit under the Gulf claims standard and the Codex general guidelines behind it. The practical test is whether the claim is on the permitted list and whether your composition actually supports it once the panel is calculated.
Foods for infants and young children are the strict case. Nutrition and health claims are not permitted on them unless a corresponding Codex standard specifically provides for the claim being made.
| Factor | Nutrition claim | Health claim |
|---|---|---|
| Says what | What is in the product | What it does for you |
| Example type | Source of fibre | Supports a function |
| Tested against | The declared panel | Permitted claim lists |
| Evidence | Composition data | Higher bar |
| Infant foods | Restricted | Restricted |
| Common failure | Panel does not support it | Claim not permitted |
Four reasons, and only the second is about language. A label can be translated perfectly and still be wrong on every other count.
Anything carrying a nutrition panel or a nutrition claim. What changes between them is which extra rules apply on top of the general labelling requirements.
Not sure which rules apply to yours?
Send the artwork and a recipe or specification. We will tell you which requirements bite, what the panel should say, and what has to change before submission.
You send artwork and a recipe. We send back a marked-up report Your designer makes the changes. We check the revision before you submit.
Current artwork, the recipe or specification, and any nutrient data or test reports you hold.
Food, beverage, supplement or infant product. The category decides which extra rules apply.
Nutrients, units and basis reviewed, and gaps flagged where a laboratory figure will be needed.
Translation, terminology, size and placement assessed against the requirements.
Each claim checked against what is permitted and against whether your composition supports it.
A marked-up assessment setting out what must change, what should change, and why.
We review the corrected artwork so nothing new has been introduced in the redesign.
Stricter than most brands expect, and part of it governs the artwork rather than the words. Guidance covers the translation, the terminology and the layout.
The Arabic has to be a real translation rather than a transliteration. Writing an English ingredient in Arabic letters does not satisfy it, and technical terms have recognised Arabic forms regulators expect.
Terminology matters more than fluency. Additives and chemical compounds have established Arabic names, and dialect or colloquial wording is not accepted in place of the standard terms.
Then there is layout. Guidance describes the Arabic being no smaller than the foreign language text, and consolidated in one area or mirrored against the English. That constrains the design as well as the copy.
Size and placement rules change the artwork itself. Brands that budget for translation and overlook redesign are the ones caught out late.
Two things from you, and one thing back from us. The more complete the first set, the fewer assumptions we have to flag in the report.
We review and advise. We do not produce the finished artwork, and we say so plainly because the two are different jobs. Your designer or printer makes the changes, and we check the revision before it goes in so the fix has not introduced something new.
Priced per label rather than per hour. A range sharing one recipe across pack sizes costs less per item than several unrelated products, because the panel work is shared.
Per label
One product, one pack size, reviewed against the panel, the Arabic and the claims on it.
Per variant
Several pack sizes or flavours. Each is its own label, though shared recipes reduce the work behind them.
On quote
A catalogue reviewed together, usually ahead of a first entry to the market or a rebrand.
Each pack size is a separate product here, so a range of three sizes is three labels rather than one.
A complete dataset makes the review quick. A missing nutrient means laboratory work before the panel can be finished.
Every claim is checked against what is permitted and against your own composition, so a busy front of pack takes longer.
An existing Arabic label reviewed is faster than one that has to be specified from scratch.
We have not published fee figures for the authorities involved. Published sources on this topic contradict each other, and the most detailed of them names a regulator that was dissolved in 2020, so we would rather confirm current charges than repeat them. Riz & Mona Consultancy quotes the review work against your label count.
You have a list of changes and the reasoning behind each one. The label then goes through the normal assessment as part of registration, with far less chance of coming back.
Standards written regionally, adopted nationally, and enforced locally. That is why a label can satisfy a Gulf standard and still meet an emirate requirement it missed.
Publishes the labelling and nutritional labelling standards the Gulf states adopt as their own.
Maintains the UAE versions of those standards, which is the form that applies to your product.
Runs the label assessment that food goes through before import, alongside product registration.
Analyse the product where declared values need evidence behind them rather than a calculation.
Send the artwork, the recipe and any nutrient data you hold. We will tell you what the panel should say, where the Arabic falls short, and which claims will not survive a review.